Sarah Jessica Parker addresses Kim Cattrall-Rift 'It hurts so much' - The Hollywood Reporter

Sarah Jessica Parker addresses Kim Cattrall-Rift ‘It hurts so much’ – The Hollywood Reporter

Sarah Jessica Parker She has spoken at length about the disagreement in her relationship with Kim Cattrall One of the four main stars of the popular HBO comedy series Sex and the City And two adaptations for the big screen, in which she played the role of Samantha alongside Carrie Parker. For the first time, Parker explained why Cattrall was not asked to join her and like thatThe satk Reviving the series that recently had its first season on HBO Max.

Talking to Scott Feinberg on me THR‘s chatter prizes On the podcast, Parker admitted that it was “very difficult to talk about the situation with Kim,” but she wanted to “sort of how it happened” to explain why it’s not a two-way “fight” that the media is portrayed as being. In her words, “There was one person talking.”

In Parker’s view, the problems with Cattrall may go back to 2017, when he was third Sex and the City The film was contemplated but “broke down” due to contractual demands made by Warner Bros.’ Cattrall. The studio that was to finance and distribute the film. (Reports at the time indicated that Cattrall made her engagement contingent upon the studio green-lighting a project unrelated to her.) “I wouldn’t want to do that without Kim,” Parker recounted. “It was us [she and costars Kristin Davis and Cynthia Nixon] Disappointed? surely. But it happens.”

After that, Cattrall began to publicly criticize Parker, accusing Parker of behaving harshly towards her during the original race for the Sex and the CityClaiming that the two weren’t really friends [and saying the same of her relationship with Davis and Nixon] He even refused to extend Parker’s condolences after the death of Cattrall’s brother in 2018.

“There was a lot of public conversation about how she felt about the show,” Parker said. chatter prizes Conversations that Parker finds ‘extremely distressing’ because they do not reflect our ‘experience’ [meaning hers, Davis’s or Nixon’s] Because she added, “I’ve spent so many years working really hard to always be a good fit with everyone in the group, take care of people, and be accountable to and for people, both employers and the people I work with I feel responsible for me as the producer of the program. No one else spoke of me that way.”

While Parker readily acknowledged that Cattrall “was a major contributor to the success” Sex and the City The series and movies explained, “We didn’t ask her to be a part of this [And Just Like That…] Because she made it clear that this wasn’t something she wanted to pursue, that it didn’t feel right to us anymore, and so it didn’t even cross our minds. This isn’t a “criticism” of her, it’s just learning. You have to listen to someone, and if they’re talking publicly about something and it doesn’t indicate that it’s somewhere they want to be, or someone they want to play in, or an environment they want to be in, you get to an age where you’re like, ‘OK, we hear that .”

Parker further noted, “We felt comfortable going on without her and without that part because we knew what Mikhail [Patrick King, the AJLT showrunner] you wanted to do And we thought he handled it beautifully.” [On AJLT, Samantha’s absence is attributed to a falling out that she had with Carrie after Carrie informed her that her services as a publicist were no longer needed.]

Parker concluded her remarks about Cattrall pleading with the media to stop mischaracterizing what happened: “I just want to say one thing, because you gave me this opportunity: It’s so painful for people to keep talking about this ‘fight’ – ‘fight’, ‘fight’.” I have never in my life uttered martial words about anyone I have worked with. Ever. There is no ongoing “battle”. There has been no public dispute, controversy, conversations or allegations by me or anyone on my behalf. I will not do that. This is not the way I would have gotten it. So I wish they would stop calling this a ‘cat fight’ or an ‘argument’, because it doesn’t reflect [reality]. There was only one person talking.”

* * *

Below, you can listen to [starting at 58:20] Or read Parker’s full, unedited notes about Cattrall…

It’s very simple, you know? I will be as clear as I can. It’s so hard to talk about the situation with Kim because I was so careful I never wanted to say anything unpleasant, because that’s not how I like to have complicated conversations like this, you know? So I’m going to sort of run — I think the best way to do it, frankly, is sort of by how it works.

The studio, when we were planning the third movie, there were things I asked that they couldn’t do. They didn’t feel comfortable in the meeting where she wanted to meet, so we didn’t do the movie because we didn’t want to do it without Kim, and the studio wasn’t doing it, so it fell apart. It wasn’t that she said “no” to the movie; It’s that the studio said “no” to the movie, which happens, you know. And every actor has the right to ask for things, you know, a contract that they feel good about. I would never argue with that because, frankly, it’s none of my business. Were we disappointed? surely. But this happens.

And then there was a lot of public conversation about how she felt about the show. And again, it’s not for me to say ‘You’re wrong,’ you know, it was, to you, a wonderful thing, ‘I don’t know. [But] That was not our experience. I’ve spent a lot of years working hard to always fit in with everyone in the group, to take care of people, and to be responsible to and toward people, both my employers and the people I feel responsible for as a producer of the program. And no one else has ever spoken to me that way, so it’s very painful.

She was a huge contributor to success, I think, you know? Her portrayal of this role was great and filled it all out, right? There were four points on the image, and all of them were important. But we didn’t ask her to be a part of this because she made it clear that this wasn’t something she wanted to pursue, that it didn’t feel right for us anymore, and so it didn’t even cross our minds. This isn’t a “criticism” of her, it’s just learning. You have to listen to someone, and if they’re talking openly about something and it doesn’t indicate that it’s somewhere they want to be, or someone they want to play in, or an environment they want to be in, you get to an age where you’re like, ‘OK, we hear that .”

We depended a lot on Michael [Patrick King] address him [on the show] And knowing how to talk about Samantha’s absence, because we have such affection for Samantha, and we wouldn’t have affection for Samantha—I mean, it’s all connected to Kim, so you can infer the natural inference of her existence because of Kim’s work. But we felt comfortable going on without her and without that part because we knew what Michael wanted to do. And we thought he handled it beautifully – that she was there and she was present – and that was kind of nice to all of us, I think, to the audience.

So I hope I have discussed it in a logical way.

And I just want to say one thing, because you gave me this opportunity: it is very painful for people to keep talking about this “fight” – fight, fight, fight. I’ve never uttered martial words in my life about anyone I’ve ever worked with. There is no ongoing “battle”. There has been no public dispute, controversy, conversations or allegations by me or anyone on my behalf. I will not do that. This is not the way I would have gotten it. So I wish they would stop calling this a “cat fight” or an “argument”, because it doesn’t actually reflect – there was one person talking. And I wouldn’t tell her not to do it or tell her to anyone else, so that was kind of a pain to me too.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.